Translations:CP 03100/6/en

From Corr-Proust Wiki
Revision as of 22:04, 13 December 2021 by Jciaccia (talk | contribs) (Created page with "That being said, my reply is only as clear as a terrible crisis and seventy hours of insomnia will allow. I no longer have accounts with the jobbers. I have paid Léon, Wellhoff<ref name="n7" /> etc. My only jobber is the Crédit Industriel (Carpet et Mexico). You have a list at home of the equities I own<ref name="n8" /> (pending the sales of Interborough, Hollandais, Saragosse, Maïkop and Nord Espagne). I own, for example, 57 shares in the Compagnie des Eaux<ref name=...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

That being said, my reply is only as clear as a terrible crisis and seventy hours of insomnia will allow. I no longer have accounts with the jobbers. I have paid Léon, Wellhoff[1] etc. My only jobber is the Crédit Industriel (Carpet et Mexico). You have a list at home of the equities I own[2] (pending the sales of Interborough, Hollandais, Saragosse, Maïkop and Nord Espagne). I own, for example, 57 shares in the Compagnie des Eaux[3] and Russian bonds. You only have to refer to the tables that you had drawn up[4]. The Crédit Industriel does not send out statements of securities, except on the occasions when I have explicitly requested them. The details of the account that I closed with them on 31 March is in the enclosed papers, but it cannot be of much use to you: this is why. My 2080 account is with them, which is complicated by the open credit account[5] and the liquidation account. On the other hand, having deposited certain Rothschild securities with them, whose sale was supposed to extinguish my debt and of which none except those mentioned above could be sold, I had a second separate account opened so that the income from these securities would not be absorbed by the open credit. This second account can only be in the black. They sent me the quarterly statement of the other account (2080) but not for this one, presumably because it is new.

  1. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named n7
  2. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named n8
  3. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named n9
  4. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named n10
  5. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named n11